

04
vs 08 Trials Review
Posted: July 16, 2008
American
coaches did a terrific job preparing their athletes to swim
their best at the Trials. Here are some comparisons between
the 2004 and 2008 Olympic Trials.
2008
Review Improved Times
Prelims |
Day
1 (sun) |
Day
2 (mon) |
Day
3 (tues) |
Day
4 (wed) |
Day
5 (thur) |
Day
6 (fri) |
Day
7 (sat) |
ave |
Women |
42% |
42% |
42% |
26% |
37% |
39% |
42% |
39% |
Men |
50% |
56% |
46% |
57% |
52% |
50% |
32% |
49% |
Total |
46% |
47% |
43% |
46% |
43% |
45% |
37% |
44% |
Finals |
Day
1 (sun) |
Day
2 (mon) |
Day
3 (tues) |
Day
4 (wed) |
Day
5 (thur) |
Day
6 (fri) |
Day
7 (sat) |
ave |
Women |
71% |
70% |
79% |
69% |
60% |
72% |
81% |
72% |
Men |
75% |
75% |
75% |
81% |
77% |
73% |
81% |
77% |
Total |
73% |
72% |
78% |
76% |
69% |
72% |
81% |
74% |
2004
Review Improved Times
Prelims |
Day
1 |
Day
2 |
Day
3 |
Day
4 |
Day
5 |
Day
6 |
Day
7 |
ave |
Women |
19% |
18% |
23% |
7% |
20% |
16% |
26% |
18% |
Men |
35% |
32% |
29% |
29% |
33% |
35% |
21% |
31% |
Finals |
Day
1 |
Day
2 |
Day
3 |
Day
4 |
Day
5 |
Day
6 |
Day
7 |
ave |
Women |
71% |
62% |
67% |
53% |
45% |
53% |
59% |
59% |
Men |
56% |
65% |
53% |
55% |
60% |
73% |
75% |
62% |

The
Big Home Run in Omaha
By
John Leonard
Posted: July 10, 2008
You
have heard, and will hear, a lot about the Omaha USA Swimming
Olympic Trials that were held last week. Deservedly so. Lets
hand out some big congratulations right now.
Omaha
is no longer “just a baseball town”. Its a swimming mecca. The
town embraced the sport like nothing I can remember. Everywhere
you went the man and woman on the street were totally in tune
with the event. Including the guy in the quick stop that i hit
every morning for my 5 AM Diet Coke....he asked me about the
meet every day.
The
vision came from USA Swimming’s Executive Director Chuck Wielgus.
The best “number two man” in the world, Mike Unger, enacted
that vision, in cooperation with H2Omaha’s great director, Harold
Cliff. Harold’s on-site leadership and direction caught just
about every possible detail from the near perfect seating, to
a fabulous warmup pool, to perfect “hosting” capabilities.
The
production of the meet was head and shoulders above any other
swim meet I have ever attended anywhere in the world, including
every Olympic Games and World Championships. If FINA wanted
to see what swimming “can be”, they needed to be in Omaha. Sadly,
they were not there, except for potential future FINA President
Julio Maglione from Uruguay, for one day.
The
swimmers were remarkably fast, and letter-perfect in their media
and crowd responses. Whether they triumphed like Katie and Michael,
or suffered the fate of now four time 3rd place winner Hayley
McGregory, they were fantastic with the fans, especially the
children and portrayed our sport exactly as we all would wish
it to be shown.....class people performing as elite athletes.
The
hotels were close, very nice, convenient and did i mention close?
The
restaurants were varied, close, very nice and did i mention
close?
The
crowd was animated, excited, and due to a great venue, Close
to the action.
The
warmup pool was huge, complete, and did i mention, close? (and
convenient for the athletes and coaches.
The
city’s swim coaches, led by Docker Hartfield and Doug Krecklow
of SwimOmaha, opened their practices to visiting swimmers from
ages 8 to 48 and they came to practice by the dozens each day.
Young swimmers could stay in shape while visiting for the Trials.
Thanks guys.
Much
more will be said, and deserves to be. In the baseball city,
this was a huge Home Run. Hit by Chuck Wielgus, Mike Unger and
Harold Cliff. (and their staffs and sponsors.......)
Congratulations
Guys.......I left Long Beach 4 years ago saying “can’t top this”.
I left Omaha Thinking (but not saying) the same thing.
I
know they will “make a way” to do so in four years.
Thanks
for the memories, Chuck, Mike, Harold and the City of Omaha!
(yes,
we would love to come back in four years!)

International
Swimming Hall of Fame
Posted: June 10, 2008
“The
International Swimming Hall of Fame (ISHOF) would like
to invite you, the members of CSCAA and ASCA,
to attend the 45th annual Toyota International Swimming Hall
of Fame’s Honoree Induction Ceremony…..and we are making it
easy by bringing the induction to you!
Please
join ISHOF Honorees and emcee’s Rowdy Gaines and Debbie Meyer
on Sunday, July 6, at 1 pm at the Qwest Center in Omaha, located
next to the pool. ISHOF is hosting this year’s induction during
the USA Swimming Olympic Trials so we may bring this spectacular
event to the largest gathering of coaches, athletes, Olympians,
and fans of swimming!
This
is your chance to socialize with old friends, make new friends,
celebrate and honor aquatic heroes, and show your support of
the International Swimming Hall of Fame!
As
a Member of ASCA and/or the CSCAA, you will receive a 25% discount
off the $100 luncheon price. In addition, your discounted $75
dollar ticket will include a one year membership to ISHOF. If
you are currently already a member of ISHOF, you may attend
the ceremony for a ticket price of only $50!
To
take advantage of this fabulous opportunity (and seats are limited),
please contact Meg Keller-Marvin, as soon as possible at 954-474-7010,
home office; (954) 815-7946 (cell) or via email at marvingardens840@comcast.net
prior to June 27, 2008. This offer is good for advance ticket
sales only! Tickets at the door are $100.
Please
consider attending this once in a lifetime event as we honor
the greatest of the great! Please join us in honoring Honorees:
Fred
Deburghgraeve (BEL) Honor Swimmer
Anita Nall (USA) USA Honor Swimmer
Jill Savery
(USA) Honor Synchronized Swimmer
Shelley-Taylor-Smith
(AUS) Honor Open Water Swimmer
Melvin Stewart
(USA) Honor Swimmer **
Coach Jon
Urbanchek (USA) Honor Coach
**
Melvin Stewart was inducted in 2002 but was unable to attend,
so he will be honored this year
Other
Award being presented at luncheon will include:
Al
Schoenfield Media Award: Rowdy Gaines
Buck
Dawson Author’s Award: Ernest Maglischo
President’s
Award: Ken Treadway

“What
Universities do is take in teenagers and turn them into people.”
Dr.
Myles Brand (in a lecture to the CSCAA meeting in Tucson, Az,
May 23, 2008.)
Posted: May 27, 2008
“What
Universities do is take in teenagers and turn them into people.”
“Ten
years from now, how many of your students will use what they
learned in calculus? But ten years from now, how many do you
think will be using the lessons they learned in athletics? Hence
the validity of athletics as a part of education”.
“Thus,
Universities should subsidize the cost of athletics. The question
is, how much is enough?”
If
ever there was an NCAA President who “gets it”, its Dr. Myles
Brand. A philosopher by trade, his address to the CSCAA told
fundamental truths about the nature of NCAA sports, NCAA administration
and NCAA politics of Olympic and Non-Olympic Sports.
Dr.
Brand urged college coaches to strongly and continuously promote
their sport to the larger audience of University and community,
and be the strongest possible advocates for the sport which
contains true “student-athletes”. In very direct language, he
told College Coaches to “fight for their sport”.
In
a later meeting with CSCAA, USA-Swimming and ASCA leadership,
Dr. Brand agreed to support and push forward several proposals
to strengthen collegiate swimming. We are grateful for his wisdom
and support and are working now to bring these ideas to fruition.
JL

5 Critical
Action Steps for Any College Coach TODAY
By
John Leonard
Posted: May 27, 2008
Realize
that your program and every program in the USA, need to be in
“URGENT” mode, today and everyday, if you wish to Preserve,
Protect and Expand Collegiate Swimming.
We
will publicize all candidates on our website and at the World
Clinic.
Thank
you. John Leonard

Time
(and Impetus) To Move Outside Our Comfort Box
By John Leonard
Posted: April 29, 2008
The
latest and greatest Game Plan devised by the USA Swimming Staff
under the wonderful leadership of Executive Director Chuck Wielgus
sets an ambitious goal......”Build...Increase Membership. Goal:
We seek to increase membership by at least 20% by 2012.”
Two
key strategies under this umbrella goal are “Create a Centralized
On-line Registration System” and “Develop bridge programs that
seek to transition youngsters from learn to swim programs to
competitive teams”
Lawdy,
Lawdy, I AM A BELIEVER!
If
we want to grow the sport, lets stop yakin’ and GROW THE SPORT!
Great Goal. Great strategies.
Now
allow me to stop cheerleading and think of what this will mean
in terms of needs:
1)
Some more pool time for most clubs. (start getting creative...you
may not need even a 25 yard pool for a bridge program from lessons
to team. I teach my novices in a 12 yard area of the pool. Better
control. Better focus. Better teaching results.
2)
Capable, exciting, child-loving (as opposed to just sport-loving”)
new coaches. Don’t need to be young. Don’t need to be old. Just
need to be dedicated to helping young and new swimmers improve.
Start thinking who might fit that mold for your club.
3)
More swim meets. More SHORT swim meets. More Swim Meets that
are great opening experiences to our sport. Since 20% bigger
registration immediately implies 20% “new” swimmers, the chances
are they will be “B” and below level athletes when they start
out.
4)
More entry level swim meets raises the next issue.....more entry
level OFFICIALS.
And
therein lies our next great challenge in raising our numbers.
Because volunteerism is down. Number of new LSC officials are
down. Getting parents to volunteer to do officiating is down
as the economy demands a greater and greater premium on compensated
employment. Many LSC’s cannot today, appropriately field officials
to run the number of swim meets we already need.
So,
whither the future?
In
exploring this, I went to a man who doesn’t “ask to be asked”,
the redoubtable John Wilson of Athens, Georgia, USA-Swimming
Vice President and himself a world class elite meet official,
who came up through the officiating ranks in Ohio, where, in
those days, one just became “an official” and not all the fancy
titles we have today. His reply to my question was immediate
and fair. “how hard is it to officiate a novice meet?”
Clearly,
not too hard. Know the strokes. Know what is legal. Understand
it. Watch the water. Be fair. Be reasonable. Be aware of the
philosophical concept of “if its giving someone an advantage
not allowed in the rules, it deserves a disqualification”
So,
John, we make it easier for parents to be officials?
Well,
not so fast. We have no evidence now that the “difficulty” of
becoming an official is the key problem. It may be, because
how long does the average parent officiate?
Well,
the average child is probably in USA Swimming for about four
years....so the average parent probably officiates about 3 years,
at best. Not enough time to climb the big meet pyramid. Or any
pyramid.
So,
what’s the answer?
Use
a different population.
Who,
like Martians?
No,
worse. Or better. Teenagers.
Huh?
Teenagers?
Yes,
teenagers. In one of our fastest growing and most significant
competitors, soccer, kids officiate for kids. Bigger kids for
little kids. Teenagers officiate soccer matches between little
kids. All the time. As a matter of course.
They
have energy, knowledge of the sport, a keen sense of fairness,
and oh, did i mention....energy?
Also,
they are more familiar with the internet than most of us are
with our own face. So an on-line course and test to certify
teenage officials who have either left the sport on a daily
basis, or are summer only swimmers, or “high school only swimmers”,
make a GREAT source of new officials for our coming expansion.
They
know swimming. They love swimming. They already know most of
the rules. (especially how to swim the strokes) and they do
the concept of “Fair” a lot better than some adults.
And,
they need part time employment. Whether they volunteer at officiating
novice and “B” level meets, or whether we pay them a minimum
wage, they are the best possible help we can recruit to help
fuel our growth.
And
it will put a young, fresh, “cool” face on our officiating at
the entry level meets....not the very serious, very formal face
of adult officials...and in case you haven’t noticed, the coolest
“sports” for kids are skateboarding, wakeboarding, snowboarding,
etc. where no parents are around, no parents know anything about
the sport, and no parents interfere.
Its
a fantastic idea. I hope our USA Swimming Officials group will
set about creating an entry level “swim official” test that
we can use as we grow to our new “raise you 20%” goal. Its the
way to go. Back to the future.
Kudos
to John Wilson. Our “out of the box thinking” award of the year.


Posted: April 17, 2008
Complete
presentation available
in PDF(Adobe Reader) format.

Let's
Keep the Tech Suits With The Senior Swimmers
An opinion... by John Leonard
Posted: February 10, 2008
The
last two weeks I have been at our LSC Junior Olympic Meet and
our LSC “Division II” meet, which is a nice way of saying, “the
last B meet where you can qualify for Junior Olympics”, without
making any of our supposedly delicate children swoon upon hearing
that they are in a “B” meet. (but that’s another story.)
One
of the most disturbing trends that I have seen is age group
swimmers, particularly 12 and unders and 10 and unders, in the
new hi-tech suits made by all the swimsuit companies, in prelims
and finals of these local meets.
First
of all, congratulations to Speedo, and all the other swimsuit
companies. Some have done real and very expensive research and
come up with fabulous suits that clearly assist the swimmers
in swimming faster...much faster. Others have simply done the
“Burger King Thing”. (Burger King does little to no demographic
or other studies when it locates its restaurants.....it lets
McDonalds spend its money on those expensive studies and then
Burger King just opens across the street from every new McDonalds....saves
them a lot of money and they get there 3 months later....so
what? Good bottom line approach. Trust your best competitor
to do the heavy lifting.)
Now,
the old man coach in me sighs at the sight of the new suits
on anyone, but lets face it, they are here, they are good and
they work. When it comes to setting World Records, American
Records, Ugandan Records, Finlandian records, and making Senior/International
Cuts, you’d better have one of these suits on, because the people
swimming the fast times and setting those standards for the
meets, are wearing them. If you don’t wear them, you are out
of it. Unfair for you if you’re NOT wearing one.
Case
in point, over 440 College Women have qualified for the NCAA
Division I meet this year with the “A” cut..phenomenally fast.
The biggest number in any prior year to make the NCAA Meet with
BOTH “A” and “B” cuts has been 259. Every college conference
meet in the country was incredibly fast....why???? .....The
Suits. Again. Good for the companies, Good for the Senior/International
Swimmers.
Now,
we get to the Division II Age Group Meet where the goal is to
swim fast enough and well enough to qualify for the Junior Olympics.
And
low and behold, here are the high tech $150-$450.00 suits on
10 and unders and 11 and 12 year olds.
“B”
Level 10 and unders and 11 and 12 year olds.
With some terrible stroke technique.
And
going to practice 2-4 times a week, for an hour.
And
not working all that well yet, in many cases.
And
not paying attention to the coach all that well yet, in many
cases.
And
coming late to practice in many cases, because Mom and Dad don’t
understand yet, the importance of being on time for practice.
And
coming late to warmup for the meet, because Mom and Dad don’t
understand the importance of warmup yet.
But
Mom and Dad want to “support” their child, and they are told
that those $150-$450 suits “work” and will make their child
faster. And good parents help their child swim faster, right?
Right?
Right?
SO........”honey,
get the American Express card out and lets get Clarence one
of those fancy new suits, so he can beat ________.”
Meanwhile,
some of those same parents are objecting when the club wants
to raise dues from $50 a month to $70 a month, because the club
wants to pay their coach some more, so he can get rid of that
15 year old car, and actually drive to practice in something
safe. He does the teaching of the swimmers.
Some
of those same parents don’t respond when the coach says “Clarence
really would improve a lot faster if he came to practice 3 times
a week instead of twice."
Or,
“Gee, if you could get Clarence to look up from his cell-phone
and text messaging when I am trying to talk to him, I’m pretty
sure he’d listen and learn better.”
Or,
“Please help me get Clarence to understand that hard work in
practice is what will help him swim better and faster in the
meets”.
Or,
“You said that you’d like Clarence to turn better and can I
fix that? Yes, I can, but I need Clarence to pay attention to
his turns when he’s practicing if he’s to improve, and not just
slop his way through practice without attention to details like
turns. I’m here to teach and I need him to be here to learn”.
By
buying the Tech Suit for Clarence, his parents are teaching
him that you can buy the things you want in life. You don’t
have to work for them.
You
can simply buy speed. You can fix anything that you lack with
enough money. No need to work hard. No need to Pay Attention.
No need to Learn.
And,
of course, reassuring themselves that they fully support their
child in swimming....”you know what we did at the meet this
weekend? We bought Clarence a $400 swimsuit? Can you imagine
that? When I was a kid, i swam in my underwear and now my kid
has a $400 suit! But boy, did it work! In his old suit, he hadn’t
beaten “_______” in the 200 free all season, but with this new
suit, he dusted that boy!”
So
Clarence, who all season has gone 2:25 in the 200 yard freestyle,
puts on the suit, goes 2:18 and qualifies for the JO’s where
he puts it on again and low and behold, drops ANOTHER 2 seconds
and gets to 2:16.
Hooray
for Clarence! Mom is happy. Dad is happy. Clarence thinks its
pretty cool...for about 10 minutes, until he gets out his $200
cell phone and goes back to texting his friends. Since he’s
really more into that than the swim meet, or swim team, or practice.
Now
what happens? Well, there are a couple of scenarios.
Lets
say Clarence goes to a meet, (a regular, ordinary, one session
age group meet) about two weeks later. Mom says, “oh honey,
you did so well in your new suit, put that on again and lets
see you GO!”.
So
Clarence does. and surprisingly, he just goes about the same
time...and actually, it maybe took some more work to get there.